Discussion:
Is the hobbit a member of the genus Homo?
(too old to reply)
deowll
2010-04-17 23:22:56 UTC
Permalink
http://web.me.com/redifiori/Russell_Di_Fiori/Island_Biogeography_files/foot%20of%20H.%20floresiensis.pdf

Read it then make your own call. This foot is less like the foot of living
humans than than any other organism so described.

It may well be less like the foot of living humans than the recently
described a'pith or even any known a'pith foot however do you really want to
call a tool making, fire using being whose ancestors made it across the
Wallace line under their own steam an a'pith?

If you do what does that say about the probable abilities of at least _some_
a'piths?

Of course we can't be certain that the longer toes aren't a derived feature
developed after this species reached Flores in response to local
circumstances however this being has many other physical traits shared with
pre Homo and very early Homo so . . .
deowll
2010-04-17 23:24:46 UTC
Permalink
Ooops! Wrong group!
Bob Casanova
2010-04-18 19:33:14 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:24:46 -0500, the following appeared
in alt.books.david-weber, posted by "deowll"
Post by deowll
Ooops! Wrong group!
No problem; just don't make it a hobbit...
--
Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
Benjamin
2010-04-19 02:23:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Casanova
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:24:46 -0500, the following appeared
in alt.books.david-weber, posted by "deowll"
Post by deowll
Ooops! Wrong group!
No problem; just don't make it a hobbit...
That was a pretty punny comment.
Bob Casanova
2010-04-19 19:11:10 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:23:49 -0500, the following appeared
in alt.books.david-weber, posted by Benjamin
Post by Benjamin
Post by Bob Casanova
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:24:46 -0500, the following appeared
in alt.books.david-weber, posted by "deowll"
Post by deowll
Ooops! Wrong group!
No problem; just don't make it a hobbit...
That was a pretty punny comment.
Yeah, sometimes I get Locked into Hobbitsian logic...
--
Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
Doug Jones
2010-04-19 00:07:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by deowll
Ooops! Wrong group!
No worries. It was a pretty interesting paper. Then again, I've
always been interested in paleontology. :)
Loading...